Lead Paint Removal >> Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers

Samples for dry manual sanding were taken at three different work sites; at each site, three samples were taken on an individual worker while he or she worked on one visually uniform paint surface. A distribution of potential full-shift exposures was modeled for work at each work site. It was assumed that the underlying distribution of 30-min TWAs for the task was log normal and, based on the three sample results, geometric mean and geometric standard deviation Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers values were estimated. 

These Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers values were used to simulate distributions of 8-hr TWAs based on a worker performing alternately 2, 4, and 6 hours of sanding during a workday, and having no exposure during the remainder of the shift.(24) To illustrate: For the 30-min exposures at Site 7 the estimated geometric mean is 290 mg/m3 and the estimated geometric standard deviation is 2.8; the corresponding task arithmetic mean estimate is 430 mg/m3 . 

To simulate an 8-hr TWA involving 6 hr of dry sanding, twelve 30-min TWA values were selected from this distribution and the full-shift exposure was Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers calculated assuming zero exposure for the remainder of the shift. One hundred thousand 8-hr. TWAs were simulated in this manner to obtain a stable distribution of 8-hr TWA values. 

The results of this Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers modeling are presented in Table IV. The percentage of modeled 8-hr TWAs greater than 500 mg/m3 are presented for the worker at each of the three work sites. The percentage of exceedance of 500 mg/m3 is of interest because this represents the proportion of full-shift exposures at the job site that would exceed the OSHA maximum use concentration for a half mask respirator. 

Of the fifty-eight 30-min samples taken, 57 samples were analyzed gravimetrically (an MCE filter was inadvertently used for one of the samples and therefore Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers could not be analyzed gravimetrically). The mean gravimetric results for the four dustiest work methods are presented in Table V. The 27 samples with quantifiable total dust results represented in Table V also had quantifiable lead results. 

For these samples the percentage of lead in the total dust collected on the filter was calculated. Figure 1 is a scattergram of these 27 samples, plotting the percentage of lead in the paint (x-axis) versus the percentage of lead in the filter dust (y-axis). Data for the four Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers work methods (HEPA-exhausted power sanding, uncontrolled power sanding, dry manual sanding, and dry scraping) are combined on this graph. 

The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for these 27 points is rs 5 0.543 (p,0.05). The 1:1 ratio line is superimposed on the scattergram for illustration purposes. DISCUSSION These Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers results measure airborne lead exposures associated with the exterior surface preparation work of 12 skilled residential and commercial painting contractors operating in the San Francisco Bay area. 

Although they derive from a relatively small number of samples, the results suggest several conclusions relevant to painters' risks during surface preparation. There is only a small number of other data sources with which these results can be compared: an unpublished Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers study by the California Department of Health Services of 28 painters who restored Victorian houses in San Francisco.

Data collected by D.E. Jacobs of employee exposures on lead-based paint abatement projects;(10) data presented in the Federal Register by OSHA in support of the Final Interim Lead in Construction Standard;(5) a Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers report from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries of five visits to painting jobs at pre-1950 homes.

The EPA-sponsored study of remodeling and renovation workers that included air monitoring during paint removal.(8) The validity of any comparison between these different sets of exposure data is somewhat limited by the fact that, Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers in many instances, they often represent different exposure durations. 

Full-Shift Lead Exposures The full-shift exposure data clearly show that 8-hr TWA lead exposures of residential and commercial painters can exceed the OSHA PEL of 50mg/m3 during exterior surface preparation work on lead paint surfaces. Sometimes exposures can be very high, Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers greatly exceeding the PEL. Similar findings have been reported previously in the literature. 

The data presented here also indicate that the higher full-shift exposures are associated with the use of dry manual sanding or Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers uncontrolled power sanding. Of the 15 full-shift samples that involved dry manual sanding or uncontrolled power sanding 6 samples (40%) exceeded 50 mg/m3 . 

One sample (7%) exceeded 500 mg/m3 (550 mg/m3 ) or the maximum full-shift exposure level (10 3 PEL) for which half-mask respirators provide Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers adequate protection as per the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR §1926.62). 

These results are cause for concern because both of these surface preparation methods are commonly used by residential and commercial painters (see Table I), and Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers half-mask respirators are widely used as the sole protection against the airborne lead dust. This concern is supported by the 30-min task-specific exposure results for both dry manual sanding and uncontrolled power sanding. 

The analysis of the fifty-eight 30-min samples (Table II) shows that particularly high mean airborne lead exposures were associated with dry manual sanding (420 mg/m3 ) and Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers uncontrolled power sanding (580 mg/m3 ). In fact, the mean 30-min lead exposures for these two methods were an order of magnitude higher than those for the other methods. 

This finding is consistent with the full-shift results. This study's 30-min sample results for dry manual sanding (range: 29–1200 mg/m3 ; mean: 420 mg/m3 ; GM: 220 mg/m3 ; Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers estimated 95th percentile: 2100 mg/m3 ) are in general agreement with exposure levels found in previous studies. 

In the EPA study 6 samples taken during hand scraping and Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers sanding had a geometric mean TWA of 254 mg/m3 and an estimated 95th percentile of 1410 mg/m3 . EP's study also included a meta-analysis of data from six unpublished sources involving surface preparation primarily by dry hand sanding and scraping. 

Based on 31 samples from interior work, the geometric mean exposure was 58 mg/m3 , Samples Taken By Lead Paint Workers with an estimated 95th percentile of 6350 mg/m3 ; 38 samples from similar exterior work showed a geometric mean of 4.3 mg/ m3 and an estimated 95th percentile of 114 mg/m3.

Guidelines For Cleaning Up Raw Sewage

Floods can cause damage to floors, walls, rugs and personal belongings. After a flood, it is important to clean and dry affected items as quickly as possible to prevent mold growth. If flood waters contain sewage, Sewage Cleanup Guidelines For Cleaning Up Raw Sewage it is important to disinfect contaminated items and to keep yourself from coming   read more..

Basement Drying

Before you can begin to clean up your Flood Damage Basement Drying property, it is very important to carefully document any water damage to the structure. This is very essential not only for your insurance purposes, but also to record important historic building features. If your building components are removed for   read more..

Remove Fire Smoke Smell From Clothes

This section addresses the use of masks and respirators by the public and workers to reduce inhalation of wildfire smoke, specifically harmful particles. Use of the term "mask" in this context may cause confusion for both public health officials and the general public, as it can refer to one-strap p  read more..

Water Damage

Water is by far the single most long-term destructive substance in any indoor environment. It will dissolve or weaken many building materials and supports the growth of microorganisms like mold. Because it can flow, Sewage Cleanup Water Damage has the unique capability to carry with it a wide variety of hazardous p  read more..

Asbestos Abatement Contractors

Aggressive sampling. "Aggressive sampling" shall mean a method of sampling in which the individual collecting the air sample creates activity by the use of mechanical equipment during the sampling period to stir up settled dust and simulate activity in that area of the building. AHERA. "AHER" shall   read more..

Smoke Damage

You might be anxious to clean your home or business after a Fire Damage Smoke Damage, but unless you really take the time to get professional advice, you could be wasting your efforts or creating further damage. Contact your insurance agency immediately after the fire is out. They can provide advice on fire rest  read more..

How To Remove Asbestos Paint From A Ceiling

Treat at least two different areas of each phase in this fashion. Choose representative areas of the sample. It may be useful to select particular areas or fibers for analysis. This is useful to identify asbestos in severely in homogeneous Asbestos Abatement How To Remove Asbestos Paint From A Ceiling samples. 

  read more..

Certified To Do Lead Removal

If you wish to become certified to do lead-related construction work in California, you must take training from one of the Department of Public Health's (CDPH) accredited training providers. To find out where you can take the this training, go to this link to see the list of approved lead-related co  read more..

Federal Grants For Residential Flood Protection

Odds are that the area where you live will flood again. Before you spend a great deal of money and Flood Damage Federal Grants For Residential Flood Protection effort repairing and rebuilding, ask yourself this question:Do I really want to be flooded again?If you think that you would be better off in a different location,talk to your local government or   read more..

Preventing Child Lead Exposure By Window Replaceme

Preventing Child Lead Exposure by Window Replacement Project Funder: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Project Partners: NYU School of Medicine, NYC Health Department, Oneida County Health Department, and local weatherization agencies Project Description: The National Institute of   read more..