Flood Damage >> Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal

Monitoring costs in operations we reviewed ranged from 20% to 33% of the total cost of debris operations. Other reviews have reported monitoring costs of as FEMA's Oversight and Management of Debris Removal Operations Page 23much as 50% of total debris costs. Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal

Having enough FEMA, state, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal or local officials present to monitor the monitors increases the direct cost of oversight even more. In such cases, oversight may cost more than the operations being overseen. Figure 11. Truck scale in action (Source: FEMA) Conclusion Debris removal is generally performed effectively and in a timely manner, but not necessarily at the lowest possible cost. 

Debris monitoring presents opportunities for improvement, as current methods leave FEMA and its applicants vulnerable to potential waste, fraud, and abuse. The effectiveness and Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal integrity of monitoring activities could be improved by having local governments perform monitoring, especially if they are sharing in collection costs. 

This could be funded by authorizing FEMA payment for force account labor as was done under the pilot program. Paying for local government employees to address leaning trees and Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal hanging branches could also provide a more secure, lower cost approach to handling these potentially complicated and difficult-to-control efforts. 

If contracted monitors are used, local officials must ensure that the monitoring company does not have an inappropriate relationship with the debris collection contractor, and that monitors are qualified, trained, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal and accurate. 

FEMA should ensure that in cases where the federal government is reimbursing 100% of all debris FEMA's Oversight and Management of Debris Removal Operations Page 24costs, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal additional federal oversight is in place, since the incentives for local oversight have been diminished. 

One option for reducing collection and monitoring costs is to pay contractors based on the weight of debris collected rather than volume. Trucks could be weighed on truck scales when they arrive at the collection site and again when they depart, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal with the difference being an accurate measure of the weight of the debris. 

Local officials reported that this system worked well and that truck scales could be rented easily and at a reasonable cost for the period that collection centers were operating. No system is totally foolproof. Drivers could still inflate debris weights by wetting down the debris prior to taking it to the collection site or even by adding gravel, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal but these actions should be apparent at the collection site. 

Making weighing systems the basis of an automated load ticket accounting system could further reduce the possibility of fraud and Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal result in improved and better controlled accounting systems for debris collection costs. 

Recommendations 

We recommend that the Associate Administrator, Response and Recovery: Recommendation #4: Provide force account labor reimbursement to cover local governments' costs of employing workers to monitor debris collections and to remove leaning trees and hanging branches, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal and encourage them to undertake such responsibilities. 

Recommendation #5: Strengthen the requirements involved in monitoring contracts to ensure that no relationships exist between debris collection contactors and monitoring contractors, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal and that monitors are properly trained and capable of independent and accurate performance. 

Recommendation #6: Explore advanced technologies to supplement monitoring staff such as GPS in trucks or Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal surveillance cameras. Recommendation #7: Assess weight-based rather than volumebased payment for debris collection and investigate whether such FEMA's Oversight and Management of Debris Removal Operations Page 25systems could be efficiently linked to debris payment accounting systems. 

Management Comments and OIG Analysis FEMA generally concurs with all of these recommendations, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal but notes that the Agency is not a party to contracts between applicants and contractors. Therefore, the Agency cannot require the use of advance technology as monitoring tools. 

FEMA acknowledges that weight-based monitoring and payment systems have some advantages over volume-based systems, but said these are not immune from potential waste, fraud, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal and abuse and still require proper monitoring and oversight to be effective. 

FEMA is considering revisions to its regulations that would incorporate the force account straight time labor reimbursement component of the PA Pilot Program. FEMA is updating its guidance in both the Debris Contracting Guidance Fact Sheet and Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal the Debris Monitoring Guide to stress that debris monitors should not have a relationship with debris removal contractors. 

FEMA stays abreast of current technologies in order to provide appropriate technical assistance to applicants when they are considering technology applications as part of their monitoring operations. FEMA also can provide appropriate funding, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal such as for the rental of temporary scales, during debris operations. 

We agree with the steps that FEMA is taking to improve the conduct of debris operations. We understand that FEMA is not a party to contracts between applicants and contractors and Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal cannot require the use of advance technology as monitoring tools. 

However, FEMA can encourage the use of cost-effective advance technology for monitoring, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal such as weight-based monitoring and payment systems, by publicizing and encouraging the use of these systems including offering financial incentives. We will determine the status of these recommendations when we receive the detailed corrective action plan in FEMA's 90 day letter. 

FEMA's Oversight and Management of Debris Removal Operations Page 26FEMA Management and Oversight FEMA's management and oversight of debris operations is subject to many of the overall challenges associated with managing the complex and geographically diverse Public Assistance program. Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal

For example, our December 2009 report3 concluded that the implementation of FEMA's PA program was hindered by untimely funding determinations, deficiencies in program management, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal and poorly designed performance measures. 

The report identified opportunities for improvement in a number of areas relevant to debris removal operations: Inconsistent and tardy eligibility determinations Inaccurate costs and scopes of work in initial project worksheets Undue delays and deferrals in making decisions regarding cost overruns and scope changes prior to closeout Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal

Insufficient detail regarding scopes of work Inappropriate negotiations with subgrantees on eligibility Failure to accept subgrantees' supporting documentation Repetitive documentation requests Unreasonable cost estimates The report concluded that these program management deficiencies are caused principally by turnover, inexperience, Nashville Flood Causing Tree Removal and lack of training within FEMA's disaster workforce.

Wind Damage To Plants

DERECHO FACTS PAGE... Note: Some of the following information, in abbreviated, question-and-answer format, is available in The Derecho FAQ. INTRODUCTION Definition of a derecho A derecho (pronounced similar to "deh-REY-cho" in English, or pronounced phonetically as " ") is a widespread, Wind Damage Wind Damage To Plants&nb  read more..

Natural Disaster

National Flood Insurance Program Answers to Questions About the NFIP Introduction to the NFIP 1. What is the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)? The NFIP is a Federal program created by Congress to mitigate future flood losses nationwide through sound, community-enforced building and zoning ord  read more..

Smoke Damage Restoration Tips

Gandhi [98,99] performed some simple modeling of three types of gas collections systems that could be used in corrosion tests, the CNET test, the cone corrosimeter, and a third system that utilized a piston cylinder chamber. He used the mass fraction of an arbitrary corrosive component of the fire e  read more..

Water Mitigation

Insulation is one of the most important parts of trying to keep your Crawl Space Drying Water Mitigation. Here are some useful tips, always install rigid or insulation that comes in batts using one of three different methods either use exterior foam, interior foam, or interior batt to create complete insulation coverage. B  read more..

How To Dehumidify Air

Dehumidification Options Tunnel Moisture Load: The cost of dehumidification is directly related to Dehumidification How To Dehumidify Air the moisture the tunnel air will pick up from water sources in the tunnel. To keep the air dry at low cost, it will be essential that water sources are eliminated or kept to a minimum. A  read more..

Trash Clean Up From Florida Hurricanes

We reported that these capability gaps are exacerbated by the need for a clear and consolidated body of PA guidance, and highlighted debris issues specifically in the following summary: FEMA's policy on debris removal is unclear and thus open to interpretation. As a result, some communities have bee  read more..

How To Hide An Aluminum Sliding Window With Wood

Drain deaerator and open inspection doors and trays. Drain all boiler feed pumps and lines.7. Drain condensate receiver tank. Open manhole on tank.8. Drain chemical feed pump barrels and dispose of chemicals in a safe manner.9. Drain water softener tank and brine receiver.10. Shut off valves to main  read more..

Mold Mitigation

These Structural Drying Mold Mitigation tracks are traits of Douglas-fir, pines, spruces and larches and are readily visible to your naked eyes, or under a low power magnifier on the end grains of planks and logs. In ponderosas, white and sugar pines, resin tracks are obviously visible as thin, brown stripes on the surfa  read more..

Learn Fire Damage Electronic Repair

Static and dynamic burn-in shall be performed at maximum recommended operating supply voltage @ TA = 125 C . Biasing conditions including the value of RL shall be selected to assure that the junction temperature shall not exceed Tj max specified for the device type.2/ See MIL-HDBK-1331: Parameters t  read more..

About Smoke Damage Restoration Process

Restoration Process Step 1 It takes approximately four days and a team of three cleaning experts to clean a unit of this size. These four days includes a complete cleaning from ceiling to floor and includes cabinets, bathrooms and other rooms. This can be referred to as basic overall cleaning. When   read more..